A
people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like
a tree without roots. – Marcus
Garvey
Why is it, to some foreign observers, we are a people with
an identity crises? I think they are not far from the truth. We deemed inferior any
locally made goods even when it is at par or superior than the same product
abroad. We’re awed when some Filipinos speaks English with an American twang but
amused when someone interchange “F” and “P” or “V” and “B”. We readily
“accept” strangers who are fair-skinned and mestizo-looking in contrast to how we treat the same person if his dark-skinned. We dress and act like liberal westerners yet we do
the sign of the cross or utter “Susmaryosep” on anything we see or feel is in
conflict with our catholic upbringing (as if these symbolic gesture and
incantation shields us from what we perceived as sin). If you think the
last statement is false or exaggerated, try to imagine a woman in
“spaghetti tops” and mini-skirt kneeling in deep supplication. Now, go to your
local church and see if she’s there.
I’m no social psychologist or historian but, I believed, colonization is
one factor. It also depends on the colonizer. The “business oriented”
Dutch who once ruled Indonesia
or the “pedigree obsessed” British in India are only interested in their colony’s resources. They leave the “natives” alone to practice what they want.
They don’t mingle with them, thus the local inhabitant’s culture is intact. We,
on the other hand, are unfortunate of being colonized by countries that not
only want our resources but wants to mess-up our psyche as well.
Our first “master”, who happens to produce the likes of
Torquemada, destroyed our heritage by burning artifacts that linked us to our
past and brainwashed us into accepting their belief. The second was even worst.
It implemented “scourge earth” warfare against what they call “fierce
savages”, wiping entire towns and killing anything that move. And after the
dust settled, they made us believed they're our “Big Brother”, going out of there
way to help their “little brown brother”. Giving us the semblance they are better
than the Spaniards but making sure we are subservient to their wants. They
saturate us with their “ways” and material things with the intention of developing
the perception - there is no difference between them and us. They made “coconuts”
out of us (brown outside, white inside).
Have you heard the phrase “White man’s burden”? It’s the
title of a movie about America's white man’s treatment of blacks. It drives home
the message by putting the former's shoe on the latter’s foot. But its origin is Kipling’s
poem criticizing America’s
policy towards the Philippines.
This poem, together with Samuel Clemens warning regarding consequences, did not
deter America’s
imperialistic ambition, even if it means destroying the identity of a people. Perhaps,
they think, it is a small price to pay for the greater good of US of A.
I don’t know if losing one’s identity is good or bad. If the
Spaniards weren’t so zealous, my parents may have named me “Ahmed” or “Sulaiman”.
Being immersed in a muddled cultural soup made us xenocentric but enabled us to also assimilate easily in
foreign environment with minimal culture-shock or none at all. It also created “conyos”
the likes of Malou Fernandez and James Soriano.
I hate to say it but it’s true. Culture-wise... we're
mongrels.
You say it like it is and I totally agree with you. You should have been a teacher so you can mold young minds to think critically. It is not too late, is it?
ReplyDeletethe big diff with the Spaniards was they not only conquered and colonized but converted everyone to their religion. The Brits didn't export their religion. when this happens you can change people's minds easily, rob them of their identity. It was subjugation to the max.
ReplyDeletebertN, I think it's not too late. Through this blog, I can still reach out to those who are "mis-informed".
ReplyDeletebw, not only the Spaniards. The American also did it to us but in a subtle way. Me think its more effective when you brainwashed a subject without knowing. The subject is more cooperative and willing.
ReplyDeletesad but true. hard nowadays to pinpoint what is really "ours". :(
ReplyDeletetndcallphilippines, yes. some foreigners doesn't even consider us asians. btw, thanks for dropping by.
ReplyDeleteFor me, culture is constantly and gradually changing/modified as it is influenced by many factors around, eg. in case of the Philippines, the Spaniards, Americans, etc. Kaya kung ano man ang kasalukuyang kultura ng Pilipinas o kung sino man ang Pilipino sa ngayon, it is NOT a sort of identity crisis. Oh, but I don't want to say that a typical Filipino is James Soriano or Malu Fernandez. Huh!
ReplyDeleteI love, and I agree with the advantages you've pointed out(at the final part of this post) of being who we (Filipinos) currently are- resilient and versatile.
Honestly, your stlye of writing/your blog is one of the major reasons why I just can't leave the blogosphere.
...one of the FEW major reasons why I just can't leave the blogosphere.
ReplyDeleteRJ, you honored me with your comment. Maraming salamat.
ReplyDeletefirst timer here. what an enlightening post.
ReplyDeletebeing mongrels - not so bad is it?
PhotoCache, they say mongrels are better than pure breed in terms of resistance and survivality.
ReplyDeleteThanks for dropping by. : )
agree ako sa iyo. pati sa pagbili ng mga produkto, may paniwala ang marami na mas superior ang gawa ng banyaga.
ReplyDeletealam mo bang sa pamamalengke, sinisikap kong made in pinas ang pinipili ko? bawang ng ilocos. sibuyas ng pinas, hindi ng taiwan.
"alam mo bang sa pamamalengke, sinisikap kong made in pinas ang pinipili ko? bawang ng ilocos. sibuyas ng pinas, hindi ng taiwan."
ReplyDeleteNgayon alam ko na. : D
It's a good thing I know some part of our history and i'm continuously digging up too.
ReplyDelete