Saturday, July 02, 2011

Buhay Abroad (Sn. 1)

21 comments:

  1. Hahah! Sa Australia matagal na ring ipinaglalaban ng mga Australian Activist Groups ang marriage equality pero hindi ina-approve.

    Ako, against sa same-sex marriage. Halimbawa kasing maipatupad 'yan, same-sex divorce naman ang 'pag-aawayan'. Besides, being a believer, hindi talaga tanggap ng Maykapal ang ganitong pagsasama.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really am against same sex marriage. I have friends who are in relationships with the same sex, worst, my best friend is into it, but then, they have minds of their own, matatanda na sila, di ko na kayang baluktutin ang kanilang mga pananaw.

    ReplyDelete
  3. RJ & Sheng, Ako naman I don't mind if two people of the same gender enter into a relationship. What I don't like is when they want their relationship sanctioned by the church. Sa huwes, oo, pero sa pare, imposible.

    "Marriage rites" in the first place was invented by religion. Bawal sa paniwala nila ang same sex marriage. Tapos gusto ng "gay" activists may basbas ng pare ang pag sasama nila.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hehe. Natawa naman ako kay Helloow (at talagang nakapamaywang pa ang hitad!).

    Ditto, Ed. Yes to same-sex relationship ☺ (cross out RJ...sayang...hehe); and a big NO to same-sex church marriage.

    On the issue of TNT: masigasig ngayon ang Kuwait Government to get rid of illegal expats. Nagkaroon sila ng four-month amnesty at para duon sa mga hindi nag-avail, the next days will prove to be the most difficult dahil pag-iibayuhin daw ang mga checkpoints ngayon dito.

    Hmp...wala n b talagang pagbabago ang isip mo RJ? Jowk.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nebz, mas matindi dito. If your company did not pass the required 25% saudinization, they'll put it on red status. Meaning, hindi ka na makakapag hire ng expats. Not only that, may standing order dito na all expats are allowed only a maximum of 6years to stay in the kingdom effective this year. Ewan ko lang ha, kung kaya na nila.

    ReplyDelete
  6. isa ito sa mainit na debate namin dati nung nasa law school pa ako. personally, i am against same-sex marriage because (1) marriage is about procreation ans (2) marriage is no ordinary contract. but then again, those who support SSM should be heard and respected too.

    ReplyDelete
  7. lawstude, ang sagwa nga pakinggan ng same-sex-marriage. Dapat siguro baguhin at tawagin na lang same-sex-union (SSU). >: D

    ReplyDelete
  8. ihihih! ilang beses ko muna binasa bago ko naintindihan! lol bobo ko nalang! hahaha ang kulet

    ReplyDelete
  9. iya_khin, hehehe, salamat sa pag bisita.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ay! tita...kaya mo yan.. nakatagal ka nga na tnt eh..baboosh!..


    teka di bagay sakin..(ay pwede rin pala mahaba ang hair ko eh)..:)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tsong, baliktad na ngayon. Magdadalawang isip ka muna kung ang kaharap mo ngayon ay pogi at macho.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hello Blogusvox, please welcome me here in the dessert. I've been counting camels here for about 34 days now. Cheers and thanks in advance ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi KK, how are you? Welcome to the biggest sandbox on earth! : )

    ReplyDelete
  14. hahaha, hay grabe bading pala "helooow"....bakit ang mga bading hindi naman nanganganak pero dumadami? hahaha....against ako sa same sex marriage nasa bibliya yan

    ReplyDelete
  15. susku. may mga straight na ikinakasal sa simbahan na di naman nagtatagal. may mga gay na mas matagal pa ang pagsasama kumpara sa ilang marriages na alam ko. utang na loob, hamo na. ang gusto lang naman nila ay may papel na sila ay kinikilalang magkasama at may benepisyo ng pagsasama. let's wish them the best and help them make the system work for them, di ba? two less lonely people, di ba?

    ayan na naman ako. liberal at sobrang independent to the point na gusto mo akong sakalin. hahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Para sa akin, "Live and let live", I am not an opinionated person. As long as they don't bother me, they can live however they want and whoever they want to live with. I am not going to force my standards on anybody and neither should they, to me.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sardz, kahit noon pang BC (before Christ) they already exist. Mas maluwag lang ang society ngayon kaya napapansin mo. : )

    ReplyDelete
  18. atticus, Third sex partners don't bother me and I don't mind if they want their relationship legalized. May karapatan din sila. What I find tacky is when they insist to solemnize their union in the church.

    BTW, being liberated and independent is fine with me. I'm just not comfortable with girls who are too liberated and stubbornly independent.

    ReplyDelete
  19. beatburn, thank you.

    bertN, amen to that!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm fine thank you how about you? Kararating ko lang dito puro uwian na ang pinag-uusapan ng mga kasama ko sa work. Hahaha!

    ReplyDelete